June 27, 2002
The Linnet's Tale, Dale C. Willard
This should be loathsomely sweet, but it wasn't. It's about an
anthropomorphized colony of mice and how they react to the arrival of a
barn cat, and it's told by an adopted orphan linnet. It's charming because
the characters would be charming if human - more than a bit
Cranford - the alterations of style and society to fit mice are
coherent, and it's a real plot, because it's quite clear that death is real.
Posted by clew at
08:28 PM
10th Grade, Weisberg
Lordy; awful. Imagine the Adrian Mole diaries if Mole had stupider
classmates and lower ambitions and missed those by a greater margin.
Posted by clew at
08:18 PM
Tools of the Trade, Jeff Taylor
There's a glossy coffee-table shopping book of woodworking tools out; this
isn't it. It has nice pictures of mostly old tools, but the essays are the
body of the book. It suffers a little from a too-constant tone, as volumes
of essays often do, but read separately they're charming: mostly elegies
for the craft and time once condensed into woodworking hand-tools and
hand-habits and rapidly lost to mass production, a fair amount about the
author's family and building things with and for them, some cargo-cult
shopping. Not much of the last, although it gets the pictures.
If you read one essay, I recommend 'Framing Square'. It has a tidy little
moral plot and a tantalizing view of the framing square as a calculating tool:
Given the diameter of a cogwheel and the pitch of its cogs, you
can easily find the number of cogs with a steel square, or determine the
length of a hoop around a wooden tank. Got any pulleys you would like to
replace to make a shaft go faster or slower? A steel square is the answer
to most calculating problems you'd encounter on a small farm in
1909.
Posted by clew at
08:16 PM
June 26, 2002
The Big Spenders, Lucius Beebe
Oh!
magnificoes! Money in the Gilded Age had a really excellent
time, completely proportional to the grinding misery of the poor in the
same era. The poor do not get even a look-in in this book. Beebe was a
tail-end of money himself, and squired the failing heirs of massive wealth
around - in between some lively newspaper work of his own - and was an
enthusiast of and expert on spending money. You;d think this would be
irritating to read, but it was distant, sounds entertaining, and besides
many of these people came to a bad end, if you need schadenfreude. (Spelling?)
"Private varnish", that is, privately owned train cars, are at the top
of Beebe's list - are there any left running, do you suppose? With several
maid's bells and gold-plated plumbing? (An investment in efficiency -
"saves polishing".)
Interesting detail of between-the-wars travel, when money could not be
pulled out of an ATM, or even most banks:
In a day before American Express credit cards and traveler's checks,
a letter of credit was a formidable document issued by one's home bank in
the amount of a sum sequestered against it in Boston, New York, or
Cleveland. This bedsheet-sized document handsomely engrossed and sealed was
presented at the bank's European correspondents... who advanced what the
traveler might need in pounds or francs and wrote the amount on the back of
the letter of credit. It was the only known way of financing
travel....
The opening move was to dispatch either by hand or through
the post a letter to, say, Baring Brothers' main office in the city
acquainting the management with one's identity, references, family and
financial background, and warning of one's impending arrival with the
intention of drawing against a letter issued by the Old Colony Trust of
Boston, It was wise to suggest a date for the rendezvous at least four or
five days in the future...
On the appointed morning the party of the
first part arrayed himself as for a garden party at Buckingham Palace,
braided-edge morning tail coat, black silk hat, umbrella, and wash gloves.
...
It would take until the afternoon to secure the currency from the
vaults, count it, and record the serial numbers of banknotes. First there
would be lunch at the Travellers' Club....Colchester oysters, Melton
Mowbray pie, a cold lobster, Stilton cheese, claret, Port, and cigars
followed in the ritual of the busnessman's luncheon, after which a state
progress in reverse to the bank was in order.
Posted by clew at
12:09 AM
June 25, 2002
Thinks..., David Lodge
Another professor's midlife crisis adultery novel; see
How to be Good &ff. Lodge has rung
plenty of changes on the subject, of course, and this is perked up by
amusing student writing exercises - well, I thought the S*m**l B*ck*tt
parody was funny - and somewhat tentative irruptions of computing and game
theory. It isn't a bad novel, but his earlier professorial ones are
probably funnier, and
Richard Powers'
Galatea 2.2 blows this out of the
water esp. as SF-themes-treated-by-respectable-litrachure-writer. (That's
not a fair comparison, as Powers is generally a depth charge.)
There is better female POV writing in this than in any Lodge novel I remember.
Posted by clew at
11:50 PM
The Lord of Middle Air, Michael Scott Rohan
Shares substance with
The Steel Bonnets (strongly) and perhaps
Avram Davidson's Virgil the Magician books, both of which I like. The writing
isn't as baroque as Davidson's, nor as chewy as Border Marches pastiche can
be, but is crisp and plain and moves the plot right along.
Posted by clew at
11:43 PM
June 03, 2002
How To Be Good, Nick Hornby
Another novel about a writer's midlife marital crisis (see
The Beauty of the Husband), but written from
the spouse's point of view, not the writer's. Much interesting stuff lightly
handled; division of roles in a marriage, difficulty of switching, thought
vs. feeling, Faith vs. Works, and how to be good. I also like the writing,
which is light but not plain: echoes of Coleridge and Woolf used for meaning
as well as sound.
Posted by clew at
07:46 PM
June 01, 2002
Junk English, Ken Smith
Mockery is a thin meal, even when one mocks the deserving.
Junk
English has typography like Fowler's
Modern English
Usage, but lacks the confidence, or was not given the room, to
describe solid as well as junk English. A whole book (though short) of
examples of terrible usage is a nauseating diet. Some of the cute
names for classes of bad use are too cute to be useful; "People
Reduction", to point out that we now read of
consumers instead of
people.
Some of them are funny, though: "Lack of Will", for advertising's
not-actually-claims. (This is a joke about the idion as well as the meaning,
unlike "People Reduction".)
If I regard this book as a extra-cranky appendix to
Fowler it's a much better book. It does have some corrections to its
terrible examples, and besides, it's not fair to expect anything else to be
Fowler.
It could be the right book to leave suggestively around the office copier.
The cover is bright orange and practically anyone might leaf through
it while fiddling with a paperclip. I wonder what perpetrators of terrible
prose think while they're writing it - would they recognize their errors?
Posted by clew at
03:15 AM
Valley of the Dolls, Jacqueline Susann
Was there a movie made of this recently? Why was it in my consciousness? It
was full of vaguely sexy events, and the female characters were unhappy for
a whole varied array of reasons, but I can't actually say it was good. (I do
think it was better than the last modern 'shopping-and-sex' novel I read,
mostly because it had less shopping.)
Things I didn't expect: '40s good girl was much more aware of sexual norms
and behaviors than I thought she would be, although for somewhat clinical
A-normal-women-would reasons.
Posted by clew at
02:59 AM